p-ISSN: 1454-7848
e-ISSN: 2068-7176



Introducere: Deoarece debutul în tulburarea afectivă bipolară (TAB) este frecvent cu un episod depresiv (sau episoade depresive), diferențierea de tulburarea depresivă recurentă (TDR) în primele faze ale tulburării poate fi dificilă, ceea ce poate duce la erori de tratament și o evoluție negativă pe termen lung. Obiective: De a compara unele variabile clinice, profilul simptomatic al episodului depresiv la un grup de pacienți cu TAB și TDR și de a identifica posibilele corelații dintre varabilele studiate, care ar putea avea valoare predictivă în diferențierea celor două tulburări afective. Metode: 51 de pacienți diagnosticați cu TAB și 65 de pacienți diagnosticați cu TDR conform criteriilor ICD-10, internați în Clinica Psihiatrică Timișoara între ianuarie 2010 și februarie 2012 au fost înrolați în acest studiu. Metodele de evaluare au inclus: versiunea română a MINI, scalele HAM-D și MADRS și un chestionar realizat de către autori pentru culegerea de informații despre simptomele depresive atipice. Datele socio-demografice și alte variabile au fost obținute prin interviu direct, fișele pacienților și de la medicul curant. Rezultate: Vârsta mai tânără la debut, istoricul familial de tulburări psihiatrice, agitația, comportamentul suicidar și simptomele psihotice au fost mai frecvente la pacienții bipolari, iar durata episodului mai mare, oboseala și libidoul scăzut au fost mai frecvente în grupul cu depresie recurentă. Concluzii: Există numeroase similitudini în profilul simptomatic a celor două tipuri de depresie, dar și câteva trăsături caracteristice. Identificarea trăsăturilor caracteristice ar putea ghida diagnosticul din primele faze ale tulburării, asigurându-se astfel implicit și un tratament medicamentos corespunzător.

Depressive episodes are characteristic for both bipolar affective disorder (BD) and recurrent depressive disorder (RDD). In clinical practice the difference between the two affective disorders is given by the presence or absence of mania or hypomania. Because the onset in bipolar affective disorder is often with a depressive episode (or several episodes) and because some patients underrate previous periods of elevated mood, differentiating it from RDD can be difficult in the first phases of the disorder. Thus, the high rates of misdiagnosis or tardily diagnosed bipolar affective disorder, reported by many studies (1-4) is not surprising.
The phenomenology of depression has been the focus of several studies, which concluded that finding specific clinical characteristics for depression may have a considerable value in differentiating the two affective disorders. Some authors reported higher rates of psychomotor agitation, psychotic symptoms (5, 6), atypical vegetative traits (7, 8), positive family history for affective disorders, early onset and psychoactive substance abuse (9, 10) in bipolar depressive patients than in recurrent depressive patients. As a result of the divergent opinions regarding the existence of specific depressive symptoms, much is yet to be proven, to see if and in what way certain characteristics may help early differentiation of BD from RDD (7, 11).
It is very important to differentiate the two affective disorders after the first few episodes because treatment errors may have negative consequences for the long-term prognosis by possibly causing high episode recurrence and also lead to a development of treatment resistance.
In this study we compared the symptomatic profile of the depressive episodes and some socio- demographical and clinical data in two groups of patients with BD and RDD who were admitted in the Timișoara Psychiatric Clinic. Our intention was to identify possible correlations between the studied variables which might have predictive value in differentiating between the two affective disorders.


116 inpatients, admitted in the Timișoara Psychiatric Clinic between January 2010 and February 2012 with severe depression were enrolled in this study. Of these, 51 patients met the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for BD and 65 for RDD (12). Other inclusion criteria were: age 18 to 60 years, HAM-D 17 score ≥ 18. Cases with current comorbid psychiatric disorders, severe somatic or neurological illness which would interfere with the assessments, abuse or addiction to psychoactive substances were excluded from this study. All patients signed informed consent forms before enrollment. The study was approved by the local ethics commitee.

All cases included in the study were assessed the first week following admittance. We used the romanian v e r s i o n   ( 5 . 0 . 0 )   o f   t h e   M I N I   ( I n t e r n a t i o n a l Neuropsychiatric Interview) as the structured clinical interview (13). Socio-demographical data and some variables (age at onset, number of episodes, disorder duration, mean depressive episode duration, family history of psychiatric disorders, history of psychotic symptoms during the depressive episode and suicide attempts) were obtained by direct interview, patient files and the attending psychiatrist. Data regarding atypical vegetative symptoms (hypersomnia, increased appetite, weight gain) referring to the current and previous episodes, was collected by using a questionnaire designed by the author. Depression severity and symptomatic profile were assessed by using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 17) (14) and the Montgomery- Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (15). Both rating scales were used to better rate and analyze a broader spectrum of depressive symptoms. Treatment influence upon the depressive symptoms was not a study objective at this stage.


Because of the sample size and the fact that the cases come from a clinical population, we used the Liliefors normality test, which showed a non-gaussian data distribution. Accordingly, we applied non-parametric statistical tests, with results being considered significant if p≤ 0.05. We used the following statistical tests: non-parametric tests for differentiating means and ranks, the Mann-Whitney-U test, One Way ANOVA and ANOVA factor tests, the χ2 test for differentiating frequencies and the Spearman R non-parametric correlation test.


The percentage of females in the BD group and the RDD group was 64.61 % and 62.75 % respectively, mean age upon study entry was 43.45 years (SD 9.08) in the BD group and 48.60 years (SD 7.37) in the RDD group. There were no significant statistical differences regarding sex distribution and mean age between the two patient groups.
To identify the differences between the two groups regarding general clinical characteristics we used the Mann-Whitney-U test. The results can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. General clinical characteristics of the two patient groups.

As predicted, mean age at onset was lower in the BD group than in the RDD group (28.07 versus 37.96 years). Because of the difference between the two groups regarding disorder duration, we cannot consider the difference regarding the item total number of episodes as significant. Mean depressive episode duration was significantly lower in the bipolar group. The reported family history of psychiatric disorders was significantly higher in the BD Group (39.21 % versus 16.90 %, χ2 = 7.252, p=0.007).
The symptom profile of the depressive episode (Table 2) was obtained by using the MINI, HAM-D 17 and MADRS scales. For atypical vegetative symptoms, psychotic symptoms during the episode and suicide attempts the assessment focused on the current and previous depressive episodes. Because in this stage of the study we only noted the presence or absence of these symptoms, we applied the χ2 test to compare the two patient groups.

Table 2. Symptomatic profile: bipolar depression versus unipolar depression.


Significant differences between the two patient groups were found regarding suicide attempts, agitation, diminished libido, fatigue and psychotic symptoms during the current episode or in previous episodes. In the BD group we found higher rates of suicide attempts than in the RDD group (43.14 % versus 20.00 %, p=0.049). Interestingly, we found no significant differences regarding the frequency of suicidal thoughts in the two patient groups (56.90 % versus 63.10 %, p=0.650).In the BD group we found higher rates of agitation and psychotic symptoms during the current episode or in previous episodes than in the RDD group. In the RDD group we found higher rates of fatigue and diminished libido than in the BD group.
The severity of depressive symptomatology was assessed by using the HAM-D 17 and MADRS scales. Table 3 illustrates the mean total scores of the two scales and mean item scores which showed significant differences between the two patient groups.

Table 3. Total scores and selected mean item scores of the
HAM-D 17 and MADRS scales

We found no significant differences when comparing the total scores of the two patient groups. The Mann-Whitney-U test shows a significantly higher score in the items agitation and insight in the bipolar group. The high score of the item agitation on the HAM-D 17 scale (score 2.51) may have a predictive value for bipolarity according to the One Way ANOVA analysis (p=0.000). The item insight from the HAM-D 17 Scale (score 1.19) may also have a predictive value for bipolarity, although the statistical significance after applying the One Way ANOVA test was slightly lower than for the aforementioned item. There are no specific correlations between the two items (R=0.129) which means that simultaneous high scores in both items may represent an indicator for bipolarity as the factorial ANOVA analysis results showed (item agitation F=3.80, p=0.012; item insight F=3.78, p=0.026; the resulting factor from the simultaneous presence of both items F=400.91, p=0.000). Patients with RDD showed higher scores in the MADRS scale regarding inner tension and fatigue. We applied the Spearman R test which showed correlations between several items of the MADRS Scale, as follows: inner tension and reported sadness item (R=0.258; reported sadness and fatigue, R=0.470; inner tension and fatigue R=0.207; fatigue and guilt R=0.199). For inner tension and fatigue we applied the ANOVA test to see if increased scores may be considered as predictors for any of the two affective disorders. Because we found strong correlations between the two items, we cannot state that the simultaneous presence of high scores in these items is necessary or sufficient to differentiate the two types of depression.

A tardy recognition or misdiagnosis of bipolar affective disorder and implicitly administering inadequate treatment may have negative consequences on disorder outcome and thus being able to differentiate the two disorders in the first phase has a special clinical importance. In this comparative analysis we found numerous similarities between unipolar and bipolar depression but we also identified some differences that might have a predictive value for one or the other affective disorder.
Clinical and epidemiological studies (16-19) suggest that mean age at onset is by 6 to 8 years lower in bipolar patients than in recurrent depressive patients, a difference which we also found in our study. A relatively recent study performed by Benazzi and Akiskal (20) mentions that early onset (occuring at 25 years of age or earlier), accompanied by a high episode recurrence are possible indicators for bipolar disorder. Another indicator of bipolarity mentioned by the authors is a positive family history for bipolar affective disorder. Familial studies and genetic epidemiological studies (21-23) showed a significantly higher rate of psychiatric disorders (especially affective disorders) in relatives of patients with bipolar disorder, which, as expected, we also found in our study
Regarding duration of the depressive episode, the results of our study show a shorter episode duration in BD than in RDD, which are consistent with previous studies (24-26).
In the literature there are several controversies regarding suicidality in the two affective disorders. Some authors report a higher rate of suicidal behavior and suicidal thoughts in subjects with BD type I (27, 28) and BD type II (5, 19, 29) than RDD subjects, while others found no differences (30, 31).
In the present study, a significantly higher number of bipolar patients had a history of suicide attempts when compared to recurrent depressive patients, but we found no differences between the two patient groups regarding suicidal thoughts (56.90 % in the BD group versus 63.10 % in the RDD group). The high percentage of suicidal thoughts in both patient groups, although not statistically significant, should urge further research because of its importance as a public health issue. In contradiction with other studies (11) we did not find significant differences regarding somatic symptoms of depression with the exception of libido, which is diminished in a high percentage of recurrent depressive patients. The predictive value for bipolarity of atypical symptoms has remained an ongoing subject of debate in the literature. Some studies reported a higher rate of atypical depressive symptoms in BD I patients (8, 26, 27,32) and BD II (33) than RDD patients, while other studies (25, 34), including ours, did not find differences between patients with BD and RDD. The contradictory results may be explained by the differences in methodology, sample size, but also by the possible existence of a continuous distribution of atypical depressive symptoms between BD and RDD (7).
In this study we also analyzed mean per item scores of the HAM-D and MADRS scales and found differences between the two patient groups. In the bipolar group, scores for agitation and insight were significantly higher than in the recurrent depressive group. In the RDD group, scores for inner tension and fatigue were significantly higher than in the BD group. ANOVA factorial analysis suggested that only the simultaneous presence of high scores in the items agitation and insight may be a possible indicator of bipolarity.
The limits of the study are the relatively small number of cases, the fact that the assessments did not include information about therapeutic regimen nor about the comorbid long-life states, aspects which can influence the symptomatic profile. Some assessments were retrospective and data collection was carried out without using standardized instruments. Other assessments were carried out only for the current episode. Because of the variability of depressive symptoms, ampler studies and long-term prospective assessments are to be desired.


The obtained results, with all the mentioned study limitations in mind, can be added to existent studies regarding the phenomenology of bipolar and unipolar depression. We found several similarities in the symptomatic profile and clinical data of the two depressive types, but also some different individual characteristics, such as: early onset, family history of psychiatric disorders, agitation, suicidal behavior and psychotic symptoms (more frequent in BD patients) and longer episode duration, fatigue and diminished libido (more frequent in RDD patients). Although individual depressive symptoms (regardless of frequency and severity) cannot be considered differential criteria between the two types of affective disorder, we can build models with predictive value on their basis. The practical importance of this type of studies consists of encouraging clinicians in discovering individual characteristics of the depressive episode which may guide the diagnosis in the first phases of the disorder and thus ensure proper treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: This work was co-financed by the European Social Fund through the Sectoral O p e r a t i o n a l P r o g r a m m e – p r o j e c t n u m b e r POSDRU/88/1.5/S/63117 under the coordination of “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, Romania.

1.Goldberg JF, Harrow M, Whiteside JR. Risk for bipolar illness in patients initially hospitalized for unipolar depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 2001;158: 1265-1270.
2.Perlis RH, Miyahara S, Marangell LB et al. Long-term implications of early onset in bipolar disorder: Data from the first 1000 participants in the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder (STEPBD). Biol. Psychiatry 2004;55: 875-881.
3.Smith D, Griffiths E, Kelly M et al. Unrecognized bipolar disorder in primary care patients with depression. Brit J of Psychiatr 2011;149: 49-56.
4.Wolkenstein L, Bruchmuller K, Schmid P, Mayer TD. Misdiagnosis in bipolar disorder: do clinicians show heuristic bias ? J Affect Dis
2011;130: 405-412.
5.Leyton F, Barrera A. bipolar depression and unipolar depression: differential diagnosis in clinical practice. Rev Med Chil 2010;138: 773-779.
6.Henry C, Etain B. New ways to classify bipolar disorder: going from categorial groups to symptoms clusters or dimensions. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2010;12(6):
7.Akiskal HS, Benazzi F. Continuous distribution of atypical depressive symptoms between major depressive and bipolar II disorder: dose response relationship with bipolar family history. Psychopathology2008;41: 39-42.
8.Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Silverstein B et al. Atypical depressive syndromes in varying definitions. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;256: 44-54.
9.Benazzi F. Symptoms of depression as possible markers of bipolar II disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmachol. Biol Psychiatry 2006;30: 471-477.
10.Post RM, Leverich GS, Kupka RW et al. Early onset bipolar disorder and treatment delay are risk factors for poor outcome in adulthood. J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71: 864-872.
11.Perlis RH, Brown E, Baker RW, Nieremberg AA. Clinical features of bipolar depression versus major depressive disorders in large multi- center trials. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163: 225-231.
12.International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision. World Health Organisation, 2010.
13.Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan H et al. The MINI: International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structurated diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59 Suppl.20: 22-23.
14.Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23: 56-61.
15.Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Brit J Psychiatr 1979;134: 382-389.
16.Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino J et al. Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. JAMA 1996;276: 293-299.
17.Baldessarini RJ, Bolzani L, Cruz N et al. Onset age of bipolar disorder at six international sites. J Affect Dis 2010;121: 143-146.
18.Larsson S, Lorentzen S, Mork E et al. Age at onset of bipolar disorder in a norwegian catchment area sample. J Affect Dis 2010;124: 174-177.
19.Tondo L, Lepri B, Cruz N et al. Age at onset in 3014 sardinian bipolar and major depressive disorder patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010;121: 446-452.
20.Benazzi F, Akiskal HS. How best to identify a bipolar-related subtype among major depressive patients without spontaneous hypomania: superiority of age at onset criterion, over recurrence and polarity ? J Affect Dis 2008;107: 77-88.
21.Sadovnick AD, Remnick RA, Lam R et al. Mood disorder service genetic database: morbidity risk for mood disorder in 3.942 first-degree relatives of 671 index cases with single depression, recurrent depression, bipolar I or bipolar II. Am J Med Genet 1994;59: 132-140.
22.Gershon ES, Hamovit J, Guroff JJ et al. A family study of schizoaffective, bipolar I, bipolar II, unipolar, and normal control probands. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39: 1157-1167.
23.Heun R, Maier W. The distinction of bipolar II disorder from bipolar I and recurrent unipolar depression: results of a controlled family-study.
Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; 87:279-284.
24.Mitchell P, Parker G, Jamieson K et al. Are there any differences between bipolar and unipolar melancholia ? J Affect Dis 1992;25: 97-106.
25.Cuellar AK, Johnson SL, Winters R. Distinction between bipolar and unipolar depression. Clin Psych Rev 2005;25: 307-309.
26. Forty L, Smith D, Jones L et al. Clinical differences between bipolar and unipolar depression. Brit J of Psychiatry 2008;192: 388-389.
27.Weinstock LM, Strong D, Uebelacker LA, Miller IW. DSM-IV depressive symptoms expression among individuals with a history of hypomania: a comparison to those with or without a history of mania. J Psychiatr Res 2010;44: 979-985.
28.Guillaume S, Jaussent I, Jollant F et al. Suicide attempt characteristics may orientate toward a bipolar disorder in attempters with recurrent depression. J Affect Dis 2010;122: 53-59.
29.Baek J, Park DI, Choi J et al. Differences between bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in clinical features comorbidity and family history. J Affect Dis 2011;131: 59-67.
30.Lester D. Suicidal behavior in bipolar and unipolar affective disorders: a meta-analysis. J Affect Dis 1993;27: 117-121.
31.Parker G, Roy C, Mitchell P, Hadrzi-Pavlovic D. The nature of bipolar depression: implication for the definition of melancholia. J Affect Dis
2000;59: 217-224.
32.Mitchell P, Wilhelm K, Parker G et al. The clinical features of bipolar disorder: a comparison with matched major depressive disorder patients. J Clin Psych 2001;62: 212-216.
33. Brugue E, Colom F, Sanchez-Moreno J, Cruz N, Vieta E. Depression subtypes in bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. Psychopathology 2008;41: 111-114.
Robertson HA, Lam RW, Stewart JN et al. Atypical depressvie symptoms and clusters in unipolar and bipolar depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;94: 421-427.